Panama vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Panama
57.4%
in 2019
Suriname
58.4%
in 2019
Panama rank
144th
Suriname rank
141st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Panama
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 58.4% against 57.4% in Panama, a difference of 1.0%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 144th and Suriname ranks 141st of 191 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.9% | 58.4% | 14.5% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 57.4% | 58.4% | 1.0% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Panama or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 58.4% against 57.4% in Panama as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Panama and Suriname?
- 1.0%, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Suriname?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Panama and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Panama ranks 144th and Suriname ranks 141st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.