Pakistan vs United Arab Emirates: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Pakistan
77.0%
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
76.5%
in 2019
Pakistan rank
41st
United Arab Emirates rank
43rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Pakistan
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 77.0% against 76.5% in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Pakistan ranks 41st and United Arab Emirates ranks 43rd of 191 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.3% | 77.2% | 3.8% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 75.9% | 76.9% | 1.0% | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Pakistan or United Arab Emirates?
- Pakistan, at 77.0% against 76.5% in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Pakistan and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.5%, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and United Arab Emirates?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Pakistan and United Arab Emirates rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Pakistan ranks 41st and United Arab Emirates ranks 43rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.