Nicaragua vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Nicaragua
70.0%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
70.2%
in 2019
Nicaragua rank
86th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
85th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Nicaragua
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 70.2% against 70.0% in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 86th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.0% | 75.0% | 5.1% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 70.0% | 71.2% | 1.2% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Nicaragua or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 70.2% against 70.0% in Nicaragua as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Nicaragua and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.2%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Nicaragua and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Nicaragua ranks 86th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.