New Zealand vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
New Zealand
69.5%
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
69.2%
in 2019
New Zealand rank
92nd
Saudi Arabia rank
95th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- New Zealand
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 69.5% against 69.2% in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 92nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.3% | 69.2% | 6.1% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 70.6% | 69.2% | 1.4% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, New Zealand or Saudi Arabia?
- New Zealand, at 69.5% against 69.2% in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between New Zealand and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.3%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Saudi Arabia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- New Zealand ranks 92nd and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.