Netherlands vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Netherlands
73.2%
in 2019
Samoa
72.7%
in 2019
Netherlands rank
67th
Samoa rank
70th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Netherlands
- Samoa
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 73.2% against 72.7% in Samoa, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Samoa ahead.
Netherlands ranks 67th and Samoa ranks 70th of 188 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.7% | 72.7% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 73.2% | 72.7% | 0.5% | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Netherlands or Samoa?
- Netherlands, at 73.2% against 72.7% in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Netherlands and Samoa?
- 0.5%, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Samoa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Netherlands and Samoa rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Netherlands ranks 67th and Samoa ranks 70th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.