Nepal vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Nepal
69.4%
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
69.2%
in 2019
Nepal rank
94th
Saudi Arabia rank
95th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Nepal
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 69.4% against 69.2% in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 94th and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 191 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.0% | 69.2% | 0.8% | Nepal |
| 2010s | 69.9% | 69.2% | 0.7% | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Nepal or Saudi Arabia?
- Nepal, at 69.4% against 69.2% in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Nepal and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.2%, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Saudi Arabia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Nepal and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Nepal ranks 94th and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.