Nepal vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Nepal
69.4%
in 2019
New Zealand
69.5%
in 2019
Nepal rank
94th
New Zealand rank
92nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Nepal
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 69.5% against 69.4% in Nepal, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was New Zealand ahead.
Nepal ranks 94th and New Zealand ranks 92nd of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.0% | 75.3% | 5.3% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 69.9% | 70.6% | 0.7% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Nepal or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 69.5% against 69.4% in Nepal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Nepal and New Zealand?
- 0.1%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and New Zealand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Nepal and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Nepal ranks 94th and New Zealand ranks 92nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.