Mozambique vs Niger: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Mozambique
40.2%
in 2019
Niger
40.9%
in 2019
Mozambique rank
173rd
Niger rank
171st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Mozambique
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 40.9% against 40.2% in Mozambique, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 173rd and Niger ranks 171st of 190 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.2% | 33.1% | 7.1% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 40.2% | 38.6% | 1.6% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Mozambique or Niger?
- Niger, at 40.9% against 40.2% in Mozambique as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Mozambique and Niger?
- 0.7%, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Niger?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mozambique and Niger rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Mozambique ranks 173rd and Niger ranks 171st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.