Morocco vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Morocco
70.3%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
70.2%
in 2019
Morocco rank
83rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
85th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Morocco
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 70.3% against 70.2% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Morocco ranks 83rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.3% | 75.0% | 4.7% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 70.3% | 71.2% | 0.9% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Morocco or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Morocco, at 70.3% against 70.2% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Morocco and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.1%, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Morocco and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Morocco ranks 83rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.