Mexico vs Trinidad and Tobago: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Mexico
63.0%
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
62.4%
in 2019
Mexico rank
124th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
126th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Mexico
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 63.0% against 62.4% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 124th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 126th of 191 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.1% | 62.4% | 1.7% | Mexico |
| 2010s | 63.2% | 62.4% | 0.8% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Mexico or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Mexico, at 63.0% against 62.4% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Mexico and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.6%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Mexico and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Mexico ranks 124th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 126th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.