Mexico vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Mexico
63.0%
in 2019
South Africa
62.8%
in 2019
Mexico rank
124th
South Africa rank
125th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Mexico
- South Africa
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 63.0% against 62.8% in South Africa, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 124th and South Africa ranks 125th of 191 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.1% | 62.8% | 1.3% | Mexico |
| 2010s | 63.2% | 62.8% | 0.4% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Mexico or South Africa?
- Mexico, at 63.0% against 62.8% in South Africa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Mexico and South Africa?
- 0.2%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and South Africa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mexico and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Mexico ranks 124th and South Africa ranks 125th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.