Mauritius vs Türkiye: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Mauritius
72.0%
in 2019
Türkiye
72.1%
in 2019
Mauritius rank
72nd
Türkiye rank
71st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Mauritius
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 72.1% against 72.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 72nd and Türkiye ranks 71st of 191 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.8% | 69.4% | 12.4% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 74.9% | 71.4% | 3.5% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Mauritius or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 72.1% against 72.0% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Mauritius and Türkiye?
- 0.1%, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Türkiye?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Türkiye rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Mauritius ranks 72nd and Türkiye ranks 71st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.