Mauritius vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Mauritius
72.0%
in 2019
Samoa
72.7%
in 2019
Mauritius rank
72nd
Samoa rank
70th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Mauritius
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 72.7% against 72.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 72nd and Samoa ranks 70th of 188 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.8% | 72.7% | 9.1% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 74.9% | 72.7% | 2.3% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Mauritius or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 72.7% against 72.0% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Mauritius and Samoa?
- 0.7%, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Samoa?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Samoa rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Mauritius ranks 72nd and Samoa ranks 70th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.