Mauritania vs Uruguay: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Mauritania
74.0%
in 2019
Uruguay
74.0%
in 2019
Mauritania rank
59th
Uruguay rank
59th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Mauritania
- Uruguay
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 74.0% against 74.0% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 59th and Uruguay ranks 59th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.0% | 74.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 74.0% | 74.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Mauritania or Uruguay?
- Mauritania, at 74.0% against 74.0% in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Mauritania and Uruguay?
- 0.0%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Uruguay?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mauritania and Uruguay rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Mauritania ranks 59th and Uruguay ranks 59th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.