Marshall Islands vs Mexico: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Marshall Islands
64.0%
in 2019
Mexico
63.0%
in 2019
Marshall Islands rank
122nd
Mexico rank
124th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Marshall Islands
- Mexico
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 64.0% against 63.0% in Mexico, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mexico ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 122nd and Mexico ranks 124th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Marshall Islands averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.0% | 64.1% | 0.1% | Mexico |
| 2010s | 64.0% | 63.2% | 0.8% | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Marshall Islands or Mexico?
- Marshall Islands, at 64.0% against 63.0% in Mexico as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Marshall Islands and Mexico?
- 1.0%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Mexico?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and Mexico rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Marshall Islands ranks 122nd and Mexico ranks 124th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.