Malta vs United Arab Emirates: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Malta
75.9%
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
76.5%
in 2019
Malta rank
45th
United Arab Emirates rank
43rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Malta
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 76.5% against 75.9% in Malta, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 45th and United Arab Emirates ranks 43rd of 191 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Malta or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 76.5% against 75.9% in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Malta and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.6%, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and United Arab Emirates?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Malta and United Arab Emirates rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Malta ranks 45th and United Arab Emirates ranks 43rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.