Malta vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Malta
75.9%
in 2019
Tunisia
75.6%
in 2019
Malta rank
45th
Tunisia rank
47th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Malta
- Tunisia
How they compare
Malta currently reports 75.9% against 75.6% in Tunisia, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 45th and Tunisia ranks 47th of 190 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Malta or Tunisia?
- Malta, at 75.9% against 75.6% in Tunisia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Malta and Tunisia?
- 0.3%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Tunisia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Malta and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Malta ranks 45th and Tunisia ranks 47th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.