Malta vs Somalia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Malta
75.9%
in 2019
Somalia
76.0%
in 2019
Malta rank
45th
Somalia rank
44th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Malta
- Somalia
How they compare
Somalia currently reports 76.0% against 75.9% in Malta, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Somalia has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 45th and Somalia ranks 44th of 190 countries.
Somalia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Malta or Somalia?
- Somalia, at 76.0% against 75.9% in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Malta and Somalia?
- 0.1%, with Somalia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Somalia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Malta and Somalia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Malta ranks 45th and Somalia ranks 44th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.