Malaysia vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Malaysia
57.5%
in 2019
Zambia
56.6%
in 2019
Malaysia rank
143rd
Zambia rank
145th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Zambia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 57.5% against 56.6% in Zambia, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 143rd and Zambia ranks 145th of 191 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.2% | 56.6% | 12.6% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 61.0% | 56.6% | 4.4% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Malaysia or Zambia?
- Malaysia, at 57.5% against 56.6% in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Malaysia and Zambia?
- 0.9%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Zambia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Zambia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 143rd and Zambia ranks 145th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.