Malaysia vs Saint Lucia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Malaysia
57.5%
in 2019
Saint Lucia
58.2%
in 2019
Malaysia rank
143rd
Saint Lucia rank
142nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 58.2% against 57.5% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 143rd and Saint Lucia ranks 142nd of 191 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.2% | 58.2% | 11.0% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 61.0% | 58.2% | 2.8% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Malaysia or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 58.2% against 57.5% in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Malaysia and Saint Lucia?
- 0.7%, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Saint Lucia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Saint Lucia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 143rd and Saint Lucia ranks 142nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.