Malaysia vs Panama: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Malaysia
57.5%
in 2019
Panama
57.4%
in 2019
Malaysia rank
142nd
Panama rank
143rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Panama
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 57.5% against 57.4% in Panama, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 142nd and Panama ranks 143rd of 190 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.2% | 43.9% | 25.3% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 61.0% | 57.4% | 3.6% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Malaysia or Panama?
- Malaysia, at 57.5% against 57.4% in Panama as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Malaysia and Panama?
- 0.1%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Panama?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Malaysia and Panama rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 142nd and Panama ranks 143rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.