Malawi vs Solomon Islands: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Malawi
22.4%
in 2019
Solomon Islands
11.4%
in 2019
Malawi rank
180th
Solomon Islands rank
182nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Malawi
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 22.4% against 11.4% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 11.0%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 2.0 times Solomon Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Malawi ranks 180th and Solomon Islands ranks 182nd of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 11.4% | 11.4% | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 15.7% | 11.4% | 4.3% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Malawi or Solomon Islands?
- Malawi, at 22.4% against 11.4% in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Malawi and Solomon Islands?
- 11.0%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Solomon Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Malawi and Solomon Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Malawi ranks 180th and Solomon Islands ranks 182nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.