Madagascar vs Trinidad and Tobago: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Madagascar
62.3%
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
62.4%
in 2019
Madagascar rank
127th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
126th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Madagascar
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 62.4% against 62.3% in Madagascar, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 127th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 126th of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.4% | 62.4% | 10.0% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 58.4% | 62.4% | 4.1% | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Madagascar or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 62.4% against 62.3% in Madagascar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Madagascar and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.1%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Madagascar and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Madagascar ranks 127th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 126th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.