Madagascar vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Madagascar
62.3%
in 2019
South Africa
62.8%
in 2019
Madagascar rank
127th
South Africa rank
125th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Madagascar
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 62.8% against 62.3% in Madagascar, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 127th and South Africa ranks 125th of 191 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.4% | 62.8% | 10.3% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 58.4% | 62.8% | 4.4% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Madagascar or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 62.8% against 62.3% in Madagascar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Madagascar and South Africa?
- 0.5%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and South Africa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Madagascar and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Madagascar ranks 127th and South Africa ranks 125th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.