Lesotho vs Marshall Islands: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Lesotho
64.9%
in 2019
Marshall Islands
64.0%
in 2019
Lesotho rank
119th
Marshall Islands rank
122nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Lesotho
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 64.9% against 64.0% in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Lesotho ranks 119th and Marshall Islands ranks 122nd of 190 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.9% | 64.0% | 0.9% | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 64.9% | 64.0% | 0.9% | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Lesotho or Marshall Islands?
- Lesotho, at 64.9% against 64.0% in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Lesotho and Marshall Islands?
- 0.9%, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Marshall Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Lesotho and Marshall Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Lesotho ranks 119th and Marshall Islands ranks 122nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.