Lebanon vs Sweden: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Lebanon
65.5%
in 2019
Sweden
65.9%
in 2019
Lebanon rank
115th
Sweden rank
112th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Lebanon
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 65.9% against 65.5% in Lebanon, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 115th and Sweden ranks 112th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.5% | 64.9% | 0.5% | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 65.5% | 65.5% | 0.0% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Lebanon or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 65.9% against 65.5% in Lebanon as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Lebanon and Sweden?
- 0.4%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Sweden?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Lebanon and Sweden rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Lebanon ranks 115th and Sweden ranks 112th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.