Latvia vs Uruguay: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Latvia
74.1%
in 2019
Uruguay
74.0%
in 2019
Latvia rank
57th
Uruguay rank
59th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Latvia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 74.1% against 74.0% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 57th and Uruguay ranks 59th of 190 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.7% | 74.0% | 6.7% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 74.1% | 74.0% | 0.1% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Latvia or Uruguay?
- Latvia, at 74.1% against 74.0% in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Latvia and Uruguay?
- 0.1%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Uruguay?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Uruguay rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Latvia ranks 57th and Uruguay ranks 59th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.