Latvia vs Sri Lanka: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Latvia
74.1%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
74.5%
in 2019
Latvia rank
57th
Sri Lanka rank
54th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Latvia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 74.5% against 74.1% in Latvia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 57th and Sri Lanka ranks 54th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.7% | 74.5% | 6.3% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 74.1% | 74.5% | 0.3% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Latvia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 74.5% against 74.1% in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Latvia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.4%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sri Lanka?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Sri Lanka rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Latvia ranks 57th and Sri Lanka ranks 54th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.