Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Mexico: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Lao People's Democratic Republic
64.6%
in 2019
Mexico
63.0%
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
121st
Mexico rank
124th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Mexico
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 64.6% against 63.0% in Mexico, a difference of 1.6%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 121st and Mexico ranks 124th of 190 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.6% | 64.1% | 0.5% | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
| 2010s | 64.6% | 63.2% | 1.4% | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Mexico?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 64.6% against 63.0% in Mexico as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Mexico?
- 1.6%, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Mexico?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Mexico rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 121st and Mexico ranks 124th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.