Kuwait vs Maldives: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Kuwait
79.2%
in 2019
Maldives
79.3%
in 2019
Kuwait rank
30th
Maldives rank
28th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Kuwait
- Maldives
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 79.3% against 79.2% in Kuwait, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Kuwait ahead.
Kuwait ranks 30th and Maldives ranks 28th of 190 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.0% | 79.3% | 4.7% | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 81.1% | 79.3% | 1.8% | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Kuwait or Maldives?
- Maldives, at 79.3% against 79.2% in Kuwait as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Kuwait and Maldives?
- 0.1%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Maldives?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Kuwait and Maldives rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Kuwait ranks 30th and Maldives ranks 28th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.