Republic of Korea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Republic of Korea
85.8%
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
84.0%
in 2019
Republic of Korea rank
4th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
7th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Republic of Korea
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 85.8% against 84.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 1.8%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.
Republic of Korea ranks 4th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.8% | 84.0% | 1.8% | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 85.8% | 84.0% | 1.8% | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Republic of Korea or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Republic of Korea, at 85.8% against 84.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Republic of Korea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 1.8%, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Korea and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Republic of Korea ranks 4th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.