Kiribati vs Montenegro: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Kiribati
71.1%
in 2019
Montenegro
71.2%
in 2019
Kiribati rank
79th
Montenegro rank
78th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Kiribati
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 71.2% against 71.1% in Kiribati, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 79th and Montenegro ranks 78th of 191 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.1% | 71.2% | 0.1% | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 71.1% | 71.2% | 0.1% | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Kiribati or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 71.2% against 71.1% in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Kiribati and Montenegro?
- 0.1%, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and Montenegro rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Kiribati ranks 79th and Montenegro ranks 78th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.