Jordan vs Lesotho: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Jordan
65.0%
in 2019
Lesotho
64.9%
in 2019
Jordan rank
118th
Lesotho rank
119th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Jordan
- Lesotho
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 65.0% against 64.9% in Lesotho, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 118th and Lesotho ranks 119th of 190 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.0% | 64.9% | 0.1% | Jordan |
| 2010s | 65.0% | 64.9% | 0.1% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Jordan or Lesotho?
- Jordan, at 65.0% against 64.9% in Lesotho as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Jordan and Lesotho?
- 0.1%, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Lesotho?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Lesotho rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Jordan ranks 118th and Lesotho ranks 119th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.