Japan vs Lithuania: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Japan
73.8%
in 2019
Lithuania
73.6%
in 2019
Japan rank
63rd
Lithuania rank
65th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Japan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Japan currently reports 73.8% against 73.6% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Lithuania ahead.
Japan ranks 63rd and Lithuania ranks 65th of 190 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.9% | 73.6% | 9.7% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 70.8% | 73.6% | 2.7% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Japan or Lithuania?
- Japan, at 73.8% against 73.6% in Lithuania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Japan and Lithuania?
- 0.2%, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Lithuania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Lithuania rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Japan ranks 63rd and Lithuania ranks 65th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.