Italy vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Italy
69.1%
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
69.2%
in 2019
Italy rank
97th
Saudi Arabia rank
95th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Italy
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 69.2% against 69.1% in Italy, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Italy ranks 97th and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.9% | 69.2% | 3.3% | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 69.5% | 69.2% | 0.3% | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Italy or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 69.2% against 69.1% in Italy as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Italy and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.1%, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Saudi Arabia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Italy and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Italy ranks 97th and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.