Iceland vs Republic of Korea: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Iceland
90.0%
in 2019
Republic of Korea
85.8%
in 2019
Iceland rank
1st
Republic of Korea rank
4th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Iceland
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 90.0% against 85.8% in Republic of Korea, a difference of 4.2%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 1st and Republic of Korea ranks 4th of 190 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.4% | 85.8% | 5.6% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 90.0% | 85.8% | 4.2% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Iceland or Republic of Korea?
- Iceland, at 90.0% against 85.8% in Republic of Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Iceland and Republic of Korea?
- 4.2%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Republic of Korea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Republic of Korea rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Iceland ranks 1st and Republic of Korea ranks 4th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.