Haiti vs Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Haiti
52.2%
in 2019
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
51.0%
in 2019
Haiti rank
155th
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank
158th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Haiti
- Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 52.2% against 51.0% in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of, a difference of 1.2%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Haiti has been ahead every year.
Haiti ranks 155th and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 158th of 191 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.2% | 51.0% | 1.2% | Haiti |
| 2010s | 52.2% | 51.0% | 1.2% | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Haiti or Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- Haiti, at 52.2% against 51.0% in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Haiti and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 1.2%, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Haiti and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Haiti ranks 155th and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 158th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.