Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Guinea
49.5%
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
48.8%
in 2019
Guinea rank
160th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
161st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Guinea
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 49.5% against 48.8% in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 160th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 161st of 191 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 49.5% | 43.3% | 6.2% | Guinea |
| 2010s | 49.5% | 44.4% | 5.1% | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Guinea, at 49.5% against 48.8% in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.7%, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Guinea ranks 160th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 161st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.