Guinea-Bissau vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Guinea-Bissau
68.6%
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
69.2%
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
98th
Saudi Arabia rank
95th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 69.2% against 68.6% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 98th and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 191 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.6% | 69.2% | 0.6% | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 68.6% | 69.2% | 0.6% | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 69.2% against 68.6% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.6%, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Saudi Arabia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 98th and Saudi Arabia ranks 95th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.