Guinea-Bissau vs North Macedonia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Guinea-Bissau
68.6%
in 2019
North Macedonia
67.9%
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
98th
North Macedonia rank
101st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 68.6% against 67.9% in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 98th and North Macedonia ranks 101st of 191 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.6% | 65.8% | 2.8% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 68.6% | 66.5% | 2.1% | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Guinea-Bissau or North Macedonia?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 68.6% against 67.9% in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Guinea-Bissau and North Macedonia?
- 0.7%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and North Macedonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and North Macedonia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 98th and North Macedonia ranks 101st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.