Guinea-Bissau vs Italy: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Guinea-Bissau
68.6%
in 2019
Italy
69.1%
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
98th
Italy rank
97th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Italy
How they compare
Italy currently reports 69.1% against 68.6% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 98th and Italy ranks 97th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Italy in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.6% | 65.9% | 2.7% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 68.6% | 69.5% | 0.9% | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Italy?
- Italy, at 69.1% against 68.6% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Italy?
- 0.5%, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Italy?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Italy rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 98th and Italy ranks 97th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.