Grenada vs Trinidad and Tobago: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Grenada
63.4%
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
62.4%
in 2019
Grenada rank
123rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
126th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Grenada
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 63.4% against 62.4% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 1.0%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 123rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 126th of 191 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.4% | 62.4% | 1.0% | Grenada |
| 2010s | 63.4% | 62.4% | 1.0% | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Grenada or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Grenada, at 63.4% against 62.4% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Grenada and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 1.0%, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Grenada and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Grenada ranks 123rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 126th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.