Grenada vs Mexico: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Grenada
63.4%
in 2019
Mexico
63.0%
in 2019
Grenada rank
123rd
Mexico rank
124th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Grenada
- Mexico
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 63.4% against 63.0% in Mexico, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mexico ahead.
Grenada ranks 123rd and Mexico ranks 124th of 188 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.4% | 64.1% | 0.7% | Mexico |
| 2010s | 63.4% | 63.2% | 0.3% | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Grenada or Mexico?
- Grenada, at 63.4% against 63.0% in Mexico as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Grenada and Mexico?
- 0.4%, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Mexico?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Grenada and Mexico rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Grenada ranks 123rd and Mexico ranks 124th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.