Ghana vs Sri Lanka: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Ghana
74.2%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
74.5%
in 2019
Ghana rank
56th
Sri Lanka rank
54th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Ghana
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 74.5% against 74.2% in Ghana, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 56th and Sri Lanka ranks 54th of 191 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.2% | 74.5% | 0.2% | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 74.2% | 74.5% | 0.2% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Ghana or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 74.5% against 74.2% in Ghana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Ghana and Sri Lanka?
- 0.3%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Sri Lanka?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Ghana and Sri Lanka rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Ghana ranks 56th and Sri Lanka ranks 54th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.