Finland vs Seychelles: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Finland
81.9%
in 2019
Seychelles
82.8%
in 2019
Finland rank
17th
Seychelles rank
14th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Finland
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 82.8% against 81.9% in Finland, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 17th and Seychelles ranks 14th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.2% | 84.0% | 1.1% | Finland |
| 2010s | 82.2% | 82.8% | 0.6% | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Finland or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 82.8% against 81.9% in Finland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Finland and Seychelles?
- 0.9%, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Seychelles?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Seychelles rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Finland ranks 17th and Seychelles ranks 14th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.