Finland vs Russia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Finland
81.9%
in 2019
Russia
81.6%
in 2019
Finland rank
17th
Russia rank
19th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Finland
- Russia
How they compare
Finland currently reports 81.9% against 81.6% in Russia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 17th and Russia ranks 19th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Russia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.2% | 85.0% | 0.1% | Finland |
| 2010s | 82.2% | 82.2% | 0.0% | Russia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Finland or Russia?
- Finland, at 81.9% against 81.6% in Russia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Finland and Russia?
- 0.3%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Russia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Finland and Russia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Finland ranks 17th and Russia ranks 19th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.