Estonia vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Estonia
80.7%
in 2019
Thailand
81.1%
in 2019
Estonia rank
24th
Thailand rank
21st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Estonia
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 81.1% against 80.7% in Estonia, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 24th and Thailand ranks 21st of 191 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.2% | 86.2% | 5.9% | Thailand |
| 2010s | 77.6% | 83.1% | 5.5% | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Estonia or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 81.1% against 80.7% in Estonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Estonia and Thailand?
- 0.4%, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Thailand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Estonia ranks 24th and Thailand ranks 21st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.