Estonia vs Portugal: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Estonia
80.7%
in 2019
Portugal
80.8%
in 2019
Estonia rank
24th
Portugal rank
22nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Estonia
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 80.8% against 80.7% in Estonia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 24th and Portugal ranks 22nd of 191 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.2% | 80.5% | 0.3% | Portugal |
| 2010s | 77.6% | 81.1% | 3.5% | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Estonia or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 80.8% against 80.7% in Estonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Estonia and Portugal?
- 0.1%, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Portugal?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Estonia and Portugal rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Estonia ranks 24th and Portugal ranks 22nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.