Eritrea vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Eritrea
81.4%
in 2019
Thailand
81.1%
in 2019
Eritrea rank
20th
Thailand rank
21st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Eritrea
- Thailand
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 81.4% against 81.1% in Thailand, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Thailand ahead.
Eritrea ranks 20th and Thailand ranks 21st of 190 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.4% | 86.2% | 4.7% | Thailand |
| 2010s | 81.4% | 83.1% | 1.7% | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Eritrea or Thailand?
- Eritrea, at 81.4% against 81.1% in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Eritrea and Thailand?
- 0.3%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Thailand?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Eritrea ranks 20th and Thailand ranks 21st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.