Eritrea vs Portugal: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Eritrea
81.4%
in 2019
Portugal
80.8%
in 2019
Eritrea rank
20th
Portugal rank
22nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Eritrea
- Portugal
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 81.4% against 80.8% in Portugal, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 20th and Portugal ranks 22nd of 191 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.4% | 80.5% | 0.9% | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 81.4% | 81.1% | 0.3% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Eritrea or Portugal?
- Eritrea, at 81.4% against 80.8% in Portugal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Eritrea and Portugal?
- 0.6%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Portugal?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea and Portugal rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Eritrea ranks 20th and Portugal ranks 22nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.